![]() That means that the things you 'love' or 'hate' about Bethesda (apart from their 'typical' buggy and unoptimised launches) is 'present' in this game. It is a 'Bethesda' game, which has their DNA running through it. ![]() That's not the 'subjective' part (whether I enjoy the story, the Game-play loop etc), that's purely the technical side, the solid performance, the responsiveness of the controls, how 'combat' feels etc. In the 'little' I have played so far, it is by far the 'best' Bethesda game I have played at Launch. Even when it does 'officially' release, you don't have to spend £70 to play to 'try' it out for yourself, make up your 'own' mind. The game hasn't officially released yet, but you can play it (early access Premium Edition) now. ![]() If they were 'concerned' about reviews being 'harsh' due to 'bugs/glitches', poor optimisation etc, I could understand it - but the reality is that DF are 'impressed' and in general, the reviews are ALL positive. It seems 'odd' that Bethesda would send a copy of the Game to the 'Fairest' source that will go over the game from a technical perspective with a fine tooth comb. If you watch the latest DF Direct, particularly around the 'Starfield' chat, they actually talk about them receiving code as an 'independent' outlet from Bethesda US - Bethesda UK seemed to be the 'problem' with Review codes - maybe not sure if they or MS were expected to deal with that side in the UK - maybe some 'miscommunication' because EG got 'review' code after asking. DF is 'independent' from Eurogamer although they do have a partnership.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |